Evaluating and Defending Knowledge Claims
Knowledge and Inquiry · JC 2 · Cross-Disciplinary Synthesis and Independent Study · 4.º Período

Evaluating and Defending Knowledge Claims

In preparation for their final IS paper and exams, students practice constructing robust arguments, anticipating counter-arguments, and defending their epistemological positions.

MOE Syllabus OutcomesSEAB H2 Knowledge and Inquiry (9751), Critical Thinking: Evaluation of Arguments and Knowledge ClaimsSEAB H2 Knowledge and Inquiry (9751), Independent Study: Constructing and Defending an Argument

About This Topic

In preparation for their final IS paper and exams, students practice constructing robust arguments, anticipating counter-arguments, and defending their epistemological positions.

Key Questions

  1. How do you construct a logically sound and persuasive argument?
  2. What are the most effective ways to address counter-arguments?
  3. How do you evaluate the reliability of complex knowledge claims?

More in Cross-Disciplinary Synthesis and Independent Study

Comparing Disciplinary Methodologies

Students compare and contrast how different fields of knowledge define truth, gather evidence, and justify claims. They map the boundaries and overlaps between disciplines.

2 methodologies

Formulating the Independent Study Proposal

Students apply their epistemological understanding to design a rigorous Independent Study. They refine their research questions and select appropriate methodologies.

2 methodologies